Refunds & remedies

Can I demand a refund? When Australian Consumer Law gives you the right

Plain-English guide to when the Australian Consumer Law lets you demand a refund — even when the store says no, the warranty has expired, or the receipt is gone.

Reviewed by Andy Armstrong12 min readLast reviewed 5 Sept 2026

You bought something. It broke, or it never worked properly, or it wasn't what was advertised — and now the store is pointing at a "no refunds" sign or telling you the warranty has expired. The good news: in Australia, the law on your side is far stronger than most retailers admit. The Australian Consumer Law (ACL) gives you a legal right to a refund in specific circumstances, and that right doesn't disappear because of store policy or a printed disclaimer.

Quick answer

You can demand a refund under the Australian Consumer Law where goods have a major failure and your right to reject them is still available. Not every fault qualifies: a defect the seller can put right easily and within a reasonable time is usually a non-major failure, and there the seller chooses the remedy. A failure is major where the goods are unsafe, where they cannot easily be made fit for what they are commonly used for, where they differ significantly from their description, or where a reasonable consumer who knew the full extent of the problem would not have bought them. That right comes from the goods guarantees in sections 51–59 of the ACL — most often acceptable quality (section 54), fitness for a disclosed purpose (section 55) and matching the description (section 56) — together with the remedy in section 259. It sits on top of any manufacturer's warranty. A "no refunds" sign cannot remove it. You don't always need the original receipt — proof of purchase is what matters.

What the law actually says

The Australian Consumer Law is part of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010. It applies to what you buy from a business in Australia if either the price was $100,000 or less, or the goods or services are of a kind ordinarily acquired for personal, domestic or household use. Buying for your business does not by itself put you outside the protection — the main carve-outs are goods bought to re-sell, or to use up in producing, manufacturing or repairing something else. When you buy goods, the law automatically gives you a set of consumer guarantees — promises baked into the sale that the seller cannot remove, no matter what their refund policy says.

The goods guarantees that matter most for refund disputes:

  • Section 54 — Acceptable quality. Goods must be safe, durable, free from defects, acceptable in appearance, and fit for the purposes they're commonly bought for. A washing machine that fails after 11 weeks of normal use is unlikely to be durable, depending on the cause. A sofa with stuffing visible through the seams soon after purchase may fail the acceptable-appearance and freedom-from-defects limbs.
  • Section 55 — Fitness for a disclosed purpose. If you told the seller what you needed the item for ("I need a printer that will handle 500 pages a week") and it was reasonable for you to rely on their skill or judgment, the goods must be reasonably fit for that purpose. If you picked the item yourself against their advice, the guarantee may not apply.
  • Section 56 — Match the description. If the listing said "leather" and the item is bonded leatherette, the guarantee is breached.

When a goods guarantee is breached, your remedies come from sections 259–263, and what you can demand depends on whether the failure is major.

A major failure exists under section 260 where, for example:

  • a reasonable consumer, fully aware of the nature and extent of the failure, would not have acquired the goods;
  • the goods depart in one or more significant respects from their description, or from a sample or demonstration model;
  • the goods are substantially unfit for a purpose they are commonly supplied for and cannot easily and within a reasonable time be remedied to make them fit for that purpose;
  • the goods are unfit for a particular purpose you made known to the seller and cannot easily and within a reasonable time be remedied to make them fit for that purpose; or
  • the goods are unsafe.

Two or more failures can also be considered together. They may collectively amount to a major failure if a reasonable consumer, fully aware of their nature and extent taken together, would not have acquired the goods.

Where the failure is major, section 259(3) gives you a choice between two paths: reject the goods — and once you have rejected, elect either a refund or a replacement of the same type and similar value, if one is reasonably available — or keep them and recover compensation for how much less they are worth because of the failure. Those are alternatives to each other, and rejecting is subject to the rejection period in section 262, explained under Common mistakes. Separately from whichever path you take, section 259(4) lets you recover damages for other loss that was a reasonably foreseeable result of the failure — and that applies to non-major failures too.

For a non-major failure, the seller gets the first opportunity and may choose to repair, replace or refund within a reasonable time. If they refuse or take too long, you may have the failure put right elsewhere and recover the reasonable cost, or reject the goods if the statutory conditions are met.

Services work differently. Sections 60 to 63 guarantee that a service is performed with due care and skill, is fit for a purpose you made known, and is supplied within a reasonable time. When a services guarantee is breached your remedies come from sections 267 to 270 — not from sections 259 to 263: where the failure is major you may terminate the services contract if the statutory conditions are met, or retain the benefit of the service and claim compensation for its reduced value. Other reasonably foreseeable loss may also be recoverable. For a non-major failure the supplier generally gets a reasonable opportunity to put it right first. If your complaint is about a builder, a mechanic or a hairdresser, that is the framework that applies.

The critical point: under section 64 of the ACL, a business cannot contract out of these guarantees. A "no refunds" sign, an "all sales final" tag, or a clause buried in their terms and conditions doesn't remove your statutory rights. A store may lawfully decline refunds for a simple change of mind. What it cannot do is use a blanket "no refunds" sign to deny or misrepresent your guarantee rights: any term purporting to exclude, restrict or modify them is void to that extent, and misleading consumers about those rights can itself breach the ACL.

Ready to write your demand letter?
Free, no account required to start. Tell us what happened — we draft the letter that gets your refund, replacement, or repair under the ACL.
Start your letter →

When this applies (and when it doesn't)

The consumer guarantees apply when:

  • You bought from a business (not a private seller).
  • The goods cost up to $100,000, or are of a kind ordinarily bought for personal use.
  • You're claiming on a defect or failure, not buyer's remorse.
  • You can reasonably demonstrate you bought the goods from that business. The original receipt is not always necessary, and other records may be enough depending on how clearly they identify the transaction and the goods.

They generally do not apply when:

  • You changed your mind. Stores can offer change-of-mind refunds as a goodwill policy, but the ACL doesn't require it. If you bought the right thing and it works, no guarantee was breached.
  • You broke it. Damage you caused isn't covered by a defect claim.
  • The fault was disclosed before purchase ("clearance — minor scratches noted"). You can't claim on a defect you bought knowing it existed.
  • It's a private sale (Gumtree, Facebook Marketplace from an individual, etc.). The guarantees apply to businesses, not consumers selling to other consumers — though used cars from dealers get full protection.

What to do today

If you think a consumer guarantee has been breached and you want a refund, here's the order of operations that works most often:

  1. Gather your proof. You do not necessarily need the original paper receipt. A card or bank statement, tax invoice, email confirmation, online account record, warranty document or loyalty record may establish proof of purchase — depending on whether it identifies the transaction and the goods clearly enough.
  2. Document the failure. Photos of the defect, the date you first noticed it, any communications with the seller, and notes on what's wrong and why it isn't fit for its normal purpose.
  3. Contact the seller in writing. Email or a written letter is much more useful than a phone call — it creates a record. Be specific: state the date of purchase, describe the failure, cite the consumer guarantee you say has been breached (acceptable quality, fitness for purpose, etc.), and state what you're asking for (refund, replacement, or repair).
  4. Give a reasonable deadline. Something like 7, 14 or 21 days after the business receives your written complaint, depending on urgency and complexity. This is a practical deadline you set, not a statutory one. Make clear what happens if they don't respond.
  5. Keep the goods. Don't throw out a faulty product. The seller may want to inspect it, and a tribunal may want to see it if it gets that far.
  6. If you are rejecting, say so in writing. Tell the seller in writing that you are rejecting the goods, state the ground, and make the goods available. Ordinarily you are responsible for returning rejected goods to the supplier. But under section 263, where returning them would involve significant cost because of the nature of the failure or the size, height or method of attachment of the goods, the supplier must collect them at its own expense.

If you're not sure how to draft step 3 — the letter is the bit most people get wrong — you can generate one for free in 90 seconds using fairgo. The wizard asks what happened, identifies the relevant ACL sections automatically, and produces a letter you can send under your own name.

What if the business refuses

A clear written demand often resolves the dispute on its own, and creates useful evidence if it does not. If the business doesn't respond, or refuses outright, you have escalation paths:

  • Your state's Fair Trading body. Each state and territory has a free conciliation service. They contact the business on your behalf and try to broker a resolution. Full contact details are at /agencies.
  • A court or tribunal with jurisdiction. If conciliation fails, a court or tribunal can give you a binding outcome. Which forum has jurisdiction depends on your state or territory, the parties, and the type and size of the claim. A consumer tribunal — NCAT, VCAT, QCAT or the equivalent — hears many consumer claims, and you generally do not need a lawyer. Confirm the forum, its claim limits and its current fees on the official site before filing; our tribunal guide is a starting point.
  • Financial services and insurance. If your dispute is with a bank, insurer, superannuation fund or another financial firm within its jurisdiction, use the firm's internal complaints process first. If that does not resolve it, you may be able to lodge with the Australian Financial Complaints Authority. AFCA is free for consumers, but eligibility, time limits, monetary limits and the effect of an outcome all depend on its current rules — check its website before lodging.

Saying in the demand letter that you are prepared to escalate can help. Tribunals apply the ACL rather than a business's own refund policy, so "the warranty had expired" does not answer a consumer-guarantee claim.

Common mistakes

A few mistakes commonly weaken consumer claims:

  • Confusing warranty with consumer guarantee. A warranty is an additional promise that may be given by the manufacturer, the seller or another provider, and it cannot replace or narrow your statutory rights. The consumer guarantee runs against the seller and can outlast the warranty, so "your warranty has expired" is rarely the end of the story. Your refund or replacement claim runs against the seller; sections 271 and 272 may separately support a damages claim against the manufacturer, but that is not the same refund-or-replacement election.
  • Accepting the first refusal. Frontline staff often quote store policy as if it were law. It isn't. Politely escalate to a manager and reference the ACL by name.
  • Throwing out the goods. Without the item, the business has plausible deniability about whether it was actually faulty. Keep it.
  • Demanding compensation that doesn't fit the failure. A low-value household item with a harmless, easily identified defect may justify a refund or replacement, but not a large compensation claim where no further loss was suffered. Keep any compensation claim tied to loss you can establish and document.
  • Going straight to ACCC. The ACCC investigates systemic conduct, not individual disputes. For an individual dispute, Fair Trading and a court or tribunal with jurisdiction are generally the more relevant pathways.
  • Waiting too long to raise it. The ACL doesn't set a single fixed expiry for consumer guarantee claims, but delay weakens your position: the longer you wait, the easier it is for the business to argue the fault came from ordinary use rather than a defect at supply. The right to reject is separately limited by the rejection period in section 262, which runs from the time the goods were supplied to you and lasts as long as it would be reasonable to expect a failure of that kind to become apparent — judged by the type of goods, what a consumer is likely to use them for, how long it is reasonable to use them, and how much use they would get before the fault showed. A latent fault in a long-lived product can still be rejectable well after purchase; simply having owned the goods a while does not end the right. Raise the problem in writing as soon as you notice it, and keep a dated record.

The ACL gives consumers substantial protection, but it works best when you know what it actually says, put your claim in writing, and are prepared to escalate. A "no refund" stance carries weight only until someone tests it against the guarantees.


This article is general information about Australian Consumer Law, not legal advice. The ACL is complex and your situation may have details that change the analysis. For advice on your specific case, see your state's Fair Trading body — full list at /agencies.

Ready to write your demand letter?
Free, no account required to start. Tell us what happened — we draft the letter that gets your refund, replacement, or repair under the ACL.
Not sure you're covered? Do I have a case? →
Start your letter →
Share this article

This article is general information about Australian Consumer Law, not legal advice. For advice on your specific situation, see your state's Fair Trading body — full list at /agencies.

Was this helpful?
Related reading